I've seen the new movie twice so far, and although I enjoyed it (it wasn't nearly as bad as the 6th movie in which they completely murdered the book) there were some nagging differences in the final film. I fully understand that there is no way a film can exactly follow a book...but is it really necessary to deviate so much?? Ever since the final film was released I've spent countless hours trying to explain to non-Potter fans exactly why Harry died/didn't die. It's getting exhausting! It is a very complex storyline but still, if the films followed the books more closely I'm sure I would have saved quite a few hours explaining it to everyone else. But then again, I like any excuse to talk about Harry Potter, so maybe I'm complaining for no reason.
In any case, that is my rant for today. I will be putting up a proper review of the film as soon as I have less work to catch up on for my law subjects. I guess that's the problem with going to a uni that has 3 semester a year instead of 2, you have very little time to procrastinate. And yet, I seem to achieve quite a bit instead of studying...
Assuming I can figure out how to attach a picture to this post (I'm still a bit of a newbie at blogs), I hope you enjoy some Potter humour.
No comments:
Post a Comment